Lodge Logo
Astrological Lodge of London
Astrology in all its branches
 
Home - Astrological Lodge of LondonNewsContactsProgramme of EventsAt the LodgeLinksAstrology QuarterlyFeedback
Members AreaProjectsAstro DataMembership DetailsLodge HistoryEventsAstrologer's DiarySite Map

Astrology Quarterly Articles

Writers' Guidelines | Archives | Articles | Book Reviews | Word from the President

The Moment of Astrology - Geoffrey Cornelius

Wessex Astrologer
£17.99
www.wessexastrologer.co.uk
Reviewed by Garry Phillipson in Astrology Quarterly Winter 2003

The Moment of AstrologyThis is a profound and deeply important work. It trades in mysterious and challenging ideas about astrology, the astrologer, and the world; yet is as clear in pulling its subject-matter down into comprehensible terms as it is possible to imagine. Indeed, in view of the difficulties which have prevented the book from leaving the press in recent months, the reader of omens might judge that it contains just a little bit more insight into arcane matters than the gods want us to have.

The Introduction states that: “…the primary theme (of this book) is that the main body of astrology’s practice, and especially the interpretation of horoscopes, is properly to be understood as a form of divination. It is divination despite all appearances of objectivity and natural law. It is divination despite the fact that aspects of symbolism can be approached through scientific method, and despite the possibility that a few factors in horoscopy can arguably be validated by the appeal to science.” (xxii). This position - that astrology is best understood as a form of divination – is, however, never presented in a dogmatic way. It is only arrived at after a searching, painstaking, examination of what astrologers actually do. Whatever you currently think of the divinatory case, therefore, I’d recommend Moment to you. The author’s thoroughness means that the book is a compendium of issues which will need to be addressed by anyone seeking to understand what astrology is. Though it must be noted that this is not a question which the majority of astrologers seem too worried by.
In fact, I wonder if there is an element of instinctive self-defence in the, ‘well, I know it works for me and that’s all that matters’ attitude of many astrologers. As the author remarks, “Reorienting astrology as divination leads to a realm of uncertainty with few signposts to guide us.” (p.277). So perhaps this book should come with a government warning on the cover - ‘Reading The Moment of Astrology can seriously damage your certainties’.

One of the fascinating sub-texts in the book is the way in which Cornelius, who describes himself herein as strongly Saturnian, is so obviously keen to find a structure for astrological practice, something finally real and reliable. And yet, in the end, he has the honesty and insight to acknowledge that what he has assembled here is not “a comprehensive and definitive theory of astrology. Theoretical constructions have been used… but these are better seen as stepping-stones rather than as resting places.” (p.303). In other words, this is a book which may leave you feeling that you know less about astrology than you did when you started reading it; but in a good way.

Although it is primarily a philosophical work, it is not unduly abstract. One after the other, themes are distilled from examinations of historical events. There is much discussion of sceptical attacks against astrology - from Pico della Mirandola to the Humanist’s petition-signers to Geoffrey Dean. The author concedes that some (though not all) points are valid, but argues that the sceptics are seeing another part of the Big Picture, not the whole thing. Their criticisms, then, can serve to clarify our understanding of astrology rather than undermining it altogether. Once the main brunt of the sceptics’ critique has been assimilated (in the first four chapters), the focus shifts to the model of ‘how astrology works’ which is found in the writings of Ptolemy, and to an examination of how this has been assimilated unquestioningly by Western astrologers through to the present day. Reflections and arguments arise naturally from carefully-presented case-studies of astrological readings, chiefly from Lilly and from the author’s own practice. And the conclusion? Perhaps the shortest summary is located in the phrase, ‘By you and by the science’. Cornelius writes that, “On these few words turns the practice of astrology; how they are interpreted determines the definition of astrology; what lies hidden in them is the treasure of astrology.” (p.303). And if you find that too cryptic, well, there’s nothing for it but to read the book. This is, emphatically, not a book which a review can do proper justice to.

But it is a book which every astrologer should read. Western astrology is currently in a grey limbo so far as its ideas about itself are concerned. The adventure with science (or rather, what looked as if it was going to be an adventure in the 70’s) has been a disappointment and has exposed problems in the Ptolemaic model. Although many astrologers recognise this, they still fall back on astrology-as-science views when under pressure, and this can lead to ridiculous claims being made and astrology being further discredited.

If astrology is going to improve its public image, it is surely vital that astrologers should have as clear a concept as reasonably possible of what it is that they do. And that makes this book important. Not ‘important’ in the usual book-review meaning of ‘fairly good’, but ‘important’ as in ‘get-it-now-it-will-change-the-way-you-think-forever’. But don’t take my word for it: In his Foreword, Patrick Curry writes, “This is an extraordinary book. I believe that within the astrological tradition, it is the most important since the great flowering of European astrology more than three hundred years ago.” Rob Hand calls it, “One of the most important astrological books of our time.” This is praise indeed, and so far as this reviewer is concerned, it is fully merited.

This second edition (the book was originally printed in 1994) has had a major overhaul, with several new sections and a huge number of minor changes and updates. So for those of you who have the first edition and are wondering whether it’s worth getting the new one, the answer is simple: yes. This is a real labour of love from one of astrology’s foremost thinkers.

Writers' Guidelines | Archives | Articles | Book Reviews | Word from the President

 

Search this Site

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

StarIQ.com: a refreshingly unique astrology site

counter
Hits counted from 3 April 2008 for whole site

Home | News | Programme | Membership | At the Lodge | Links | Astrology Quarterly | Feedback | Donations
Members | Projects | Events | Diary | Lodge History | Astro Data | Contacts |Site Map | Privacy | Equality

Unless otherwise stated, all material on this web site
© Astrological Lodge of London 2000 - 2008
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Enquires to The Webmaster
Top of Page